<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vorlon's Blog &#187; Gentoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/category/gentoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vorlons.info</link>
	<description>Science, Life, Computers, ... who knows what will end up in here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Serious DNS vulnerabilities &#8211; update for bind available</title>
		<link>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/07/09/174/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/07/09/174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vorlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vorlons.info/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the light of yesterday&#8217;s large coordinated release of DNS related updates to various products, I would like to point you to the updated bind packages in the portage tree.

net-dns/bind-9.4.2_p1 is currently being marked stable on all supported architectures
net-dns/bind-9.5.0_p1 has been committed with unstable keywords

Nameservers should be updated quite soon, since this issue should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the light of yesterday&#8217;s large coordinated release of DNS related updates to various products, I would like to point you to the updated bind packages in the portage tree.</p>
<ul>
<li>net-dns/bind-9.4.2_p1 is currently being marked stable on all supported architectures</li>
<li>net-dns/bind-9.5.0_p1 has been committed with unstable keywords</li>
</ul>
<p>Nameservers should be updated quite soon, since this issue should be considered serious.</p>
<p>A GLSA will be published after all security architectures have marked the affected package stable. The progress can be followed in bug <a title="bug #231201" href="https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231201" target="_blank">#231201</a>.</p>
<p>For more information have a look at the following links and the references therein:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="VU #800113" href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113" target="_blank">US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#800113</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447" target="_blank">CVE-2008-1447</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/forgery-resilience.php" target="_blank">ISC info</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Also note that if you are restricting the used outgoing ports of your nameserver by a firewall for example, this policy should be revisited.</p>
<p><em>Update 2008-07-11:<br />
</em><a title="GLSA 200807-08" href="http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200807-08.xml" target="_blank">GLSA 200807-08</a> has just been released to address this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/07/09/174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>etckeeper &#8211; keeping /etc in a git repository</title>
		<link>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/02/28/166/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/02/28/166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vorlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/02/28/166/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When having a look at git yesterday, I stumbled upon etckeeper, a tool to keep /etc in a git (or mercurial) repository and also keeps the metadata (file permissions, &#8230;) in the repo making use of metastore.
It hooks into apt but I used /etc/portage/basrc to call it before and after installing a package:
 case &#8220;$EBUILD_PHASE&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When having a look at <a href="http://git.or.cz/">git</a> yesterday, I stumbled upon <a href="http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/etckeeper/">etckeeper</a>, a tool to keep /etc in a git (or mercurial) repository and also keeps the metadata (file permissions, &#8230;) in the repo making use of <a href="http://david.hardeman.nu/software.php">metastore</a>.</p>
<p>It hooks into apt but I used /etc/portage/basrc to call it before and after installing a package:</p>
<blockquote><p> case &#8220;$EBUILD_PHASE&#8221;  in<br />
preinst)<br />
elog &#8220;Running etckeeper pre-install&#8230;&#8221;<br />
/usr/bin/etckeeper pre-install<br />
;;<br />
postinst)<br />
elog &#8220;Running etckeeper post-install&#8230;&#8221;<br />
/usr/bin/etckeeper post-install<br />
;;<br />
esac</p></blockquote>
<p>One could also modify /etc/etckeeper/post-install.d/50vcs-commit to include the package name etc. in the commit message while emerging:</p>
<blockquote><p>  &#8212; a/post-install.d/50vcs-commit<br />
+++ b/post-install.d/50vcs-commit<br />
@@ -2,5 +2,12 @@<br />
set -e</p>
<p>if etckeeper unclean; then<br />
-       etckeeper commit &#8220;committing changes after $HIGHLEVEL_PACKAGE_MANAGER run&#8221;<br />
+       case $LOWLEVEL_PACKAGE_MANAGER in<br />
+               portage)<br />
+                       etckeeper commit &#8220;committing changes after $HIGHLEVEL_PACKAGE_MANAGER run ($CATEGORY/$P)&#8221;<br />
+                       ;;<br />
+               *)<br />
+                       etckeeper commit &#8220;committing changes after $HIGHLEVEL_PACKAGE_MANAGER run&#8221;<br />
+                       ;;<br />
+       esac<br />
fi</p></blockquote>
<p>There are probably other/better ways to accomplish this and more&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyways&#8230; etckeeper looks like a nice and very flexible tool to keep /etc in a repository if one wants to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2008/02/28/166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1111111111</title>
		<link>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/18/58/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/18/58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vorlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/18/58/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a little side note&#8230;
Tonight at 01:58:31 UTC we passed epoch 1111111111 (the number of seconds since 00:00:00 1970-01-01 UTC).
$ date -u --date="Fri Mar 18 01:58:31 UTC 2005" +%s
1111111111
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little side note&#8230;<br />
Tonight at 01:58:31 UTC we passed epoch 1111111111 (the number of seconds since 00:00:00 1970-01-01 UTC).</p>
<p><code>$ date -u --date="Fri Mar 18 01:58:31 UTC 2005" +%s<br />
1111111111</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/18/58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLSAs released</title>
		<link>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/12/55/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/12/55/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vorlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/12/55/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all: Hello Planet Gentoo
Great to see the planet alive now  
Two GLSAs have just been released:

GLSA 200503-15 &#8211; X.org: libXpm vulnerability
GLSA 200503-16 &#8211; Ethereal: Multiple vulnerabilities

More are waiting in the queue already of course  
Tips for searching Bugzilla for security bugs can be found here by the way.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all: Hello <a href="http://planet.gentoo.org">Planet Gentoo</a><br />
Great to see the planet alive now <img src='http://blog.vorlons.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Two <a href="http://glsa.gentoo.org/">GLSAs</a> have just been released:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200503-15.xml">GLSA 200503-15</a> &#8211; X.org: libXpm vulnerability</li>
<li><a href="http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200503-14.xml">GLSA 200503-16</a> &#8211; Ethereal: Multiple vulnerabilities</li>
</ul>
<p>More are waiting in the queue already of course <img src='http://blog.vorlons.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tips for searching <a href="http://bugs.gentoo.org">Bugzilla</a> for security bugs can be found <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/bug-searching.xml">here</a> by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/03/12/55/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koon on &#8220;More Advisories, More Security&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/02/15/51/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/02/15/51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vorlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/02/15/51/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SecurityFocus published an article by Thierry Carrez (aka koon, operational manager of the Gentoo security team) today about the doubtful rating of the security of a product by the number of published advisory, worth a look  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securityfocus.com">SecurityFocus</a> published <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/299">an article by Thierry Carrez</a> (aka koon, operational manager of the <a href="http://security.gentoo.org">Gentoo security team</a>) today about the doubtful rating of the security of a product by the number of published advisory, worth a look <img src='http://blog.vorlons.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vorlons.info/archives/2005/02/15/51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
